In Dead Space, the Xeon E-2176M is slightly faster than the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2176M
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer – Apr 04, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 19 days newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
No clear advantages
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2176M
Apr 4th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2176M Apr 4th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $450.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
