In Control, the Xeon E-2176M is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-1620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2176M
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 28 days newer – Apr 04, 2018 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 6 years and 28 days newer
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 45 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1620
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-1620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$232.12
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B01EA1QY04.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-1620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-1620 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2176M
Apr 4th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2176M Apr 4th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1620 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $450.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA2011 |
45W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
