In Deathloop, the Xeon E-2176M is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2176M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 45 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Apr 04, 2018
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2176M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$870.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2176M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1614
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
12035
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2176M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2176M
Apr 4th, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2176M Apr 4th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
$450.00 | MSRP | $1,399.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | TRX4 |
45W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
