In Deathloop, the Xeon E-2176M is slightly slower than the FX-4300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2176M
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Apr 04, 2018 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
FX-4300
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2176M vs FX-4300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2176M vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2176M vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2176M
Apr 4th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2176M Apr 4th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $450.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AM3+ |
45W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
