In Deathloop, the Xeon E-2176M is slightly slower than the Core i3-3210. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2176M
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer – Apr 04, 2018 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Core i3-3210
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2176M vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2176M vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2176M vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2176M
Apr 4th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2176M Apr 4th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $450.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1155 |
45W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
