In Rust, the Xeon E-2176M is slightly faster than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2176M
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 225 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Apr 04, 2018 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Celeron G1610
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2176M vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
74%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2176M vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2176M vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2176M
Apr 4th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2176M Apr 4th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $450.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1155 |
45W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
