In Deathloop, the Xeon E-2136 is slightly faster than the Xeon X5690. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2136
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jul 12, 2018 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 80 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5690
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2136 vs Xeon X5690: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2136 vs Xeon X5690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2136 vs Xeon X5690 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2136
Jul 12th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X5690
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.733 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2136 Jul 12th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5690 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $289.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
80W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
