In Elden Ring, the Xeon E-2136 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2136
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jul 12, 2018 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2640
- Up to 3% faster in Elden Ring – 140 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Elden Ring
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2136 vs Xeon E5-2640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2136 vs Xeon E5-2640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2136 vs Xeon E5-2640 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2136
Jul 12th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2640
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2136 Jul 12th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2640 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $289.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011 |
80W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
