In Deathloop, the Xeon E-2136 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2136
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 months and 1 day newer – Jul 12, 2018 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 11 months and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2136
Jul 12th, 2018
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2136 Jul 12th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
$289.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
