In Dead Space, the Xeon E-2136 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2136
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 176 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 10 months and 10 days newer – Jul 12, 2018 vs Aug 31, 2017
- Is 10 months and 10 days newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
No clear advantages
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
99%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2136
Jul 12th, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2136 Jul 12th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
$289.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
