In Deathloop, the Xeon E-2136 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 1600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2136
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jul 12, 2018 vs Apr 11, 2017
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen 5 1600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$58.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2136 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2136
Jul 12th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2136 Jul 12th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600 Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| $289.00 | MSRP | $219.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
