In Elden Ring, the Xeon E-2136 is slightly slower than the FX-6200. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2136
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jul 12, 2018 vs Feb 27, 2012
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
FX-6200
- Up to 4% faster in Elden Ring – 141 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Elden Ring
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2136 vs FX-6200: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
141 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
97%
Price, $
$32.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2136 vs FX-6200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2136 vs FX-6200 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2136
Jul 12th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2136 Jul 12th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| $289.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
