In Atomfall, the Xeon E-2136 is faster than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2136
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Jul 12, 2018 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 55 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2136 vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
185 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
86%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2136 vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2136 vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2136
Jul 12th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2136 Jul 12th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $289.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
