HowManyFPS Desktop AppTrack Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon 6710E

The Core Ultra 9 285K is much faster than the Xeon 6710E on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 133% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 5 months newer
Up to 367% cheaper – $499.00 vs $2749
Up to 986% better value for money

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 367% more expensive – $2749 vs $499.00

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

League of Legends2009

Core Ultra 9 285K

435FPS

Xeon 6710E

186FPS

Valorant2020

Core Ultra 9 285K

818FPS

Xeon 6710E

568FPS

Rust2018

Core Ultra 9 285K

366FPS

Xeon 6710E

284FPS

Overwatch 22023

Core Ultra 9 285K

579FPS

Xeon 6710E

516FPS

Dota 22013

320FPS

180FPS

765FPS

486FPS

Fortnite2017

Core Ultra 9 285K

316FPS

Xeon 6710E

324FPS

Apex Legends2019

Core Ultra 9 285K

394FPS

Xeon 6710E

365FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

76%

Xeon 6710E

37%

Core Ultra 9 285K ranks 39 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

Xeon 6710E

Xeon 6710E has 40 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

Xeon 6710E

Xeon 6710E has 40 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

36 MB

Xeon 6710E

96 MB

Xeon 6710E has 60 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

3.7 GHz

Xeon 6710E

2.4 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K has a 54% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

5.7 GHz

Xeon 6710E

3.2 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 78% higher.

TDPhelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

125W

Xeon 6710E

205W

Core Ultra 9 285K draws 80W less power.

Pricehelp

Core Ultra 9 285K

$499.00

Xeon 6710E

Core Ultra 9 285KXeon 6710E

LGA1851

Sockethelp

LGA4710

Arrow Lake-S

Codenamehelp

Sierra Forest

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Server/Workstation

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Integrated GPUhelp

No Integrated Graphics

6400 MHz (DDR5)

RAMhelp

5600 MHz (DDR5)

Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core Ultra 9 285K or Xeon 6710E?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 105% faster than the Xeon 6710E on average across 100+ games, scoring 76/100 vs 37/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Xeon 6710E?expand_more

105% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core Ultra 9 285K or Xeon 6710E?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 76/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon 6710E?expand_more

Performance: Core Ultra 9 285K scores 76/100, Xeon 6710E scores 37/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core Ultra 9 285K or Xeon 6710E bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core Ultra 9 285K or Xeon 6710E?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 76/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Recent Public Benchmarks

View All

All GPUs

All CPUs

Popular Comparisons