Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 805 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 220 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $378.72 vs $2650.00
- Up to 87% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $1.72 vs $12.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 170 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
205
93%
Value, $/FPS
$12.93/FPS
13%
Price, $
$2650
14%
Buy for $2,650 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6847 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$378.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $378.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6846 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 12 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |