Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 373 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $126.99 vs $1355.00
- Up to 91% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $0.66 vs $7.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.02/FPS
9%
Price, $
$1355
9%
Buy for $1,355 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7199 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$126.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $126.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7199 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |