Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1358 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 260 vs 255 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $925.00 vs $1900.00
- Up to 52% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $3.56 vs $7.45 per FPS
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 145 vs 280 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$925
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $925 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Buy for $1,900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 22 |
32 | Threads | 44 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |