In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is slightly faster than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer
Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 80 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.16/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
12 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $3,990.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| TRX4 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 280W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
