In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is faster than the Core i5-430M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 222 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 35 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core i5-430M: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core i5-430M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core i5-430M in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
3%
L3 Cache
3 MB
1%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
2.534 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-430M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 7th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $3,990.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| TRX4 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 280 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
