Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 710 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 54% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 189 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $254.00 vs $1465.00
- Up to 89% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $1.34 vs $11.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $1,465 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7496 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$254
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $254 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7496 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |