Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1126 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 700 vs 665 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1070.00 vs $1900.00
- Up to 47% better value when playing Minecraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.53 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 48 vs 44 threads
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 145 vs 280 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
700
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1070
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
Buy for $1,900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 22 |
48 | Threads | 44 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |