Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1243 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 205 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 58 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7110 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |