Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 643 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $225.10 vs $325.00
- Up to 29% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.32 vs $1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 175 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
170
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |