Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 277 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 424 vs 408 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $93.99 vs $225.10
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.22 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
424
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |