In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is slightly slower than the Xeon E5540. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Xeon E5540
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon E5540: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon E5540 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon E5540 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | $774.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
