Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 289 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $624.95 vs $1900.00
- Up to 67% better value when playing Control than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $3.12 vs $9.50 per FPS
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 145 vs 180 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$624.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $624.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
Buy for $1,900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 22 |
32 | Threads | 44 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |