In Rust, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2680. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $638 more expensive!
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 226 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Xeon E5-2680
- Up to 75% cheaper – $211.95 vs $850.00
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Rust – $1.00 vs $3.76/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon E5-2680: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
24%
Value, $/FPS
$3.76/FPS
27%
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
210 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
78%
Price, $
$211.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon E5-2680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon E5-2680 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
