Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-9960X - $621.95 vs $699.99
- Up to 6% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9960X - $1.18 vs $1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 555 vs 529 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
529
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$621.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
555
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
94%
Price, $
$699.99
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 457 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i9-9960X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |