In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
No clear advantages
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 233 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
211 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
91%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
