In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is slightly slower than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
No clear advantages
Celeron G6900
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 46 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron G6900: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
210 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
99%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 46W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 710 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
