In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is slightly slower than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Celeron 847
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 17 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
96%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
32%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
