In Control, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is slightly faster than the Celeron 1007U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jan 20, 2013
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 17 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron 1007U: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.44/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron 1007U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Celeron 1007U in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron 1007U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 1007U Jan 20th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
| $999.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
