In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
