In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly slower than the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Xeon E5640
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
