In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2690 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $141 more expensive!
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 71% cheaper – $58.90 vs $199.99
- Up to 71% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop – $0.26 vs $0.91/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 135 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5-2690: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$199.99
29%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
29%
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5-2690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5-2690 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 135W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
