In Rust, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2689. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 224 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Xeon E5-2689
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 115 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5-2689: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5-2689 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E5-2689 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 115W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
