In Control, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1245. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
Xeon E3-1245
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 95 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E3-1245: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E3-1245 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Xeon E3-1245 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1245
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1245 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD P3000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
