Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 696 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 219 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $93.99 vs $235.00
- Up to 61% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.43 vs $1.10 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7659 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7659 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |