In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly slower than the Pentium B960. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Oct 02, 2011
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
Pentium B960
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Pentium B960: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
96%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Pentium B960 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Pentium B960 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Pentium B960
Oct 2nd, 2011
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Pentium B960 Oct 2nd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2011 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
