In Control, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Pentium B950. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Pentium B950: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Pentium B950 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Pentium B950 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Pentium B950
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Pentium B950 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
