In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly slower than the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
FX-8370
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 125 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
