In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
