In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly slower than the Core i5-760 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $122 more expensive!
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 7 years and 23 days newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jul 18, 2010
- Is 7 years and 23 days newer
Core i5-760
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 61% cheaper – $77.66 vs $199.99
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 63% better value in Deathloop – $0.34 vs $0.91/FPS
- Up to 63% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 95 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i5-760: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$199.99
38%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
37%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$77.66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i5-760 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i5-760 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-760 Jul 18th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
