In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly slower than the Core i5-2467M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jun 01, 2011
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Core i5-2467M
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 17 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i5-2467M: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
97%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i5-2467M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i5-2467M in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-2467M
Jun 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2467M Jun 1st, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2011 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
