In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is same performance as the Core i3-9100F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $104 more expensive!
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
No clear advantages
Core i3-9100F
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Up to 52% cheaper – $96.00 vs $199.99
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Deathloop – $0.43 vs $0.91/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
48%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
47%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
