In Deathloop, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly slower than the Core i3-370M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
Core i3-370M
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-370M: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
97%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-370M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-370M in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
