In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Core i3-10105T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 100 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Core i3-10105T
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-10105T: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
100 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
74 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-10105T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i3-10105T in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105T Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
