In Control, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Celeron G530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Celeron G530: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Celeron G530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Celeron G530 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G530
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G530 Sep 4th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
