In Rust, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is slightly faster than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 222 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
