In Atomfall, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Embedded V2546
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Nov 10, 2020
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Average FPS
211 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
85%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546
Nov 10th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.95 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2546 Nov 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 10th, 2020 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Graphics 384SP | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
